I'm in the market for a good digital camera to take some high-quality photos for a new travel website I'm working on. I want at least 12 megapixels and a quality lens, but I don't want to pay more than $300. That's because I tend to lose and/or damage all my digicams within about 6 months of buying them! One of the best camera deals and best alternatives to a digital SLR I've found is the Fujifilm Finepix S2500HD. I'm gonna go buy it within the next few days. Here's a nice review of this very cool camera...
Fujifilm Finepix S2500HD Camera Review
Recently, I went to the annual IT show held during March 2010 at Suntec City, Singapore and I manage to get myself a Fujifilm Finepix S2500HD camera. This camera is actually from the semi-pro series. Initially, what I really had in mind was a normal stylish camera like the CANON IXUS series which was compact and portable. However, my decision swayed when I saw the huge difference in picture quality while the price was comparable.
Firstly, the 18X zoom was a standout among others in its series at just 15X zoom. One such example at the show was the Nikon L110. At 18X maximum zoom, the image is still crisp and sharp. The Fujinon lenses are really awesome! Furthermore, it is equipped with a 35mm equivalent wide lense which allows you to capture the real depth and scale of a scene.
Next, this camera is also able to capture HD videos and HD still images vividly. It comes with a mini HDMI port which allows you to connect the camera to a HD ready television to preview your videos and images on a large screen. The camera also comes with a 12MP image sensor which further assist in capturing lavish and vivid details.
What I hate most about normal cameras is about blurry pictures. I understand that nowadays many cameras already support image stabilization. I am not in a position to comment about how other cameras' image stabilization fair in contrast to my camera, I can just say I am really pleased with how my Fujifilm Finepix works. I hardly get any blurs with my pictures even with unsteady hands. What's more is that you can also adjust the aperture speed to capture a image faster. The maximum shutter speed for this model is 1/2000s.
Another useful feature that I like is its zoom bracketing feature. It allows you to zoom and crop your pictures on the spot without having to go through the hassle of Photoshop.
Lastly, there are many modes including the scene modes, manual modes, and automatic modes. Whether you are a beginner new to cameras or you are a semi-expert ready to tune your camera, I believe it has a mode suitable for you. It also has the panaromal mode that allows you to capture multiple shots to form a continuous picture if what you are taking does not fit within a single shot.
In conclusion, I hope this article has given you a brief insight about this camera and assist you further in your purchase. Personally, I am EXTREMELY pleased with the camera and hope you will too if you decide to choose this as your camera!
More reviews: http://scrutinyreview.blogspot.com/2010/04/fujifilm-finepix-s2500hd-digital-camera.html
Useful product reviews that tell you: does this thing really work?? (And other cool stuff!)
Showing posts with label Digital Camera Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Digital Camera Reviews. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Monday, November 1, 2010
Panasonic Lumix LX5 and Canon PowerShot S95 Review
Two of the best new digital cameras on the market are the Panasonic Lumix LX5 and the Canon PowerShot S95. They are among the newer premium compact "low-light" digicams that are becoming more and more popular, especially in the United States. One good reviewer recently compared the LX5 and the S95 to let you know which one is a better deal. Check it out:
Panasonic Lumix LX5 Vs Canon PowerShot S95
Ever since testing the Canon PowerShot 300 HS recently, I have started to take a new stance towards these low light compacts that are now becoming increasingly popular. Of course, I still secretly (or rather not so secretly) harbor the feeling that larger compacts cameras like the PowerShot G11 and Panasonic LX3 would be much better. Now with the LX3's successor, the Panasonic Lumix LX5 available, I was eager to pit it to the test with the Canon PowerShot S95, which was also released very recently.
Are the Canon S95 and Panasonic LX5 much better than their predecessors?
Well looking at the specs, I would have to say... No. Not particularly. Both Canon S95 and Panasonic Lumix LX5 have 10 megapixels sensor resolution. However, the longer focal range of LX5 over the LX3 and the inclusion of HD movie in the S95, do make both newer cameras a more attractive choice to the older models.
However, looking at the specs only tells you so much so to get a feel for how these new cameras really are, we'll need to take some photos.
LX5 vs S95 - Look, Feel & Handling
The Canon PowerShot S95 is of course the more compact of the two cameras. With the improved manual ring, using advanced features like manual focus still feels very comfortable. Mind you, I don't have what Kai would call sausage fingers... Using the Panasonic Lumix LX5, I immediately notice the addition of the rear dial. For changing settings while shooting, I found it to be a very comfortable and useful addition but I have to confess that I did not like it so much when I was using it for manual focus. I actually felt better using the multi-selector in that case so it may just be a case of preference.
The more classic styling of the LX5 would of course continue to appeal to those who find it synonymous with quality imaging but the S95 is no slouch in that department either. With its more streamlined body, I was ready to try slipping the camera into the front pockets of my jeans, something I would not do with the LX5. The S95 is truer as a compact camera with the LX5 feeling more of a downsized GF1 for me. If you are likely to make use of the hot shoe, then obviously the LX5 is the obvious choice.
ISO Test
With both cameras boasting great image quality, we were eager to test out how they fare in an ISO shootout in low light situations. All shots were taken with Aperture Priority at f/5.6 at approximately the same focal length with centre spot focusing and evaluative exposure.
The performance for both is quite similar under normal lighting conditions although the noise handling of the Canon PowerShot S95 seems to trump the Panasonic Lumix LX5 a bit.
What do we think?
Looking at the night shots at ISO 1600 and ISO 3200, I was quite surprised that I found the S95 samples better exposed and with crisper details. Sure, the Canon PowerShot S95 was marketed as a low light specialist but the idea that it can better the pedigree of the Panasonic LX-series in image quality is certainly a real affirmation for the HS system of the S95. This makes taking the S95 with you to dinner parties or just a night out a really good option. I would only recommend the LX5 to those who really need to shoot at very high shutter speeds such as 1/2000 to 1/4000 seconds which is something the S95 cannot do. Of course, if you prefer to shoot with an optical or electronic viewfinder, the LX5 is again the only valid option of the two. These are of course big factors for choosing the Panasonic Lumix LX5 but as I am looking at them in terms of high image quality compacts, I will have to say that the Canon PowerShot is the winner for me.
More information on:
Canon Powershot S95 and Panasonic Lumix LX5
RAPHAEL is an ardent photographer, a member of the Marketing Communication team at DigitalRev, and a colourful personality whose favourite hobby is to tell bad jokes to people. Being driven by passion to shoot something new all the time, his photos are an exciting story even when they don't turn out quite as he expects.
---
More Reviews:
Panasonic Lumix LX5 review
Panasonic Lumix LX5 Vs Canon PowerShot S95
Ever since testing the Canon PowerShot 300 HS recently, I have started to take a new stance towards these low light compacts that are now becoming increasingly popular. Of course, I still secretly (or rather not so secretly) harbor the feeling that larger compacts cameras like the PowerShot G11 and Panasonic LX3 would be much better. Now with the LX3's successor, the Panasonic Lumix LX5 available, I was eager to pit it to the test with the Canon PowerShot S95, which was also released very recently.
Are the Canon S95 and Panasonic LX5 much better than their predecessors?
Well looking at the specs, I would have to say... No. Not particularly. Both Canon S95 and Panasonic Lumix LX5 have 10 megapixels sensor resolution. However, the longer focal range of LX5 over the LX3 and the inclusion of HD movie in the S95, do make both newer cameras a more attractive choice to the older models.
However, looking at the specs only tells you so much so to get a feel for how these new cameras really are, we'll need to take some photos.
LX5 vs S95 - Look, Feel & Handling
The Canon PowerShot S95 is of course the more compact of the two cameras. With the improved manual ring, using advanced features like manual focus still feels very comfortable. Mind you, I don't have what Kai would call sausage fingers... Using the Panasonic Lumix LX5, I immediately notice the addition of the rear dial. For changing settings while shooting, I found it to be a very comfortable and useful addition but I have to confess that I did not like it so much when I was using it for manual focus. I actually felt better using the multi-selector in that case so it may just be a case of preference.
The more classic styling of the LX5 would of course continue to appeal to those who find it synonymous with quality imaging but the S95 is no slouch in that department either. With its more streamlined body, I was ready to try slipping the camera into the front pockets of my jeans, something I would not do with the LX5. The S95 is truer as a compact camera with the LX5 feeling more of a downsized GF1 for me. If you are likely to make use of the hot shoe, then obviously the LX5 is the obvious choice.
ISO Test
With both cameras boasting great image quality, we were eager to test out how they fare in an ISO shootout in low light situations. All shots were taken with Aperture Priority at f/5.6 at approximately the same focal length with centre spot focusing and evaluative exposure.
The performance for both is quite similar under normal lighting conditions although the noise handling of the Canon PowerShot S95 seems to trump the Panasonic Lumix LX5 a bit.
What do we think?
Looking at the night shots at ISO 1600 and ISO 3200, I was quite surprised that I found the S95 samples better exposed and with crisper details. Sure, the Canon PowerShot S95 was marketed as a low light specialist but the idea that it can better the pedigree of the Panasonic LX-series in image quality is certainly a real affirmation for the HS system of the S95. This makes taking the S95 with you to dinner parties or just a night out a really good option. I would only recommend the LX5 to those who really need to shoot at very high shutter speeds such as 1/2000 to 1/4000 seconds which is something the S95 cannot do. Of course, if you prefer to shoot with an optical or electronic viewfinder, the LX5 is again the only valid option of the two. These are of course big factors for choosing the Panasonic Lumix LX5 but as I am looking at them in terms of high image quality compacts, I will have to say that the Canon PowerShot is the winner for me.
More information on:
Canon Powershot S95 and Panasonic Lumix LX5
RAPHAEL is an ardent photographer, a member of the Marketing Communication team at DigitalRev, and a colourful personality whose favourite hobby is to tell bad jokes to people. Being driven by passion to shoot something new all the time, his photos are an exciting story even when they don't turn out quite as he expects.
---
More Reviews:
Panasonic Lumix LX5 review
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)